EnglishSphereOnline

Sean Reed Sean Reed

0 Course Enrolled • 0 Course Completed

Biography

AD0-E902인증덤프공부 - AD0-E902최신버전시험대비공부문제

ITDumpsKR는 여러 it인증에 관심 있고 또 응시하고 싶으신 분들에게 편리를 드립니다. 그리고 많은 분들이 이미 ITDumpsKR제공하는 덤프로 it인증시험을 한번에 패스를 하였습니다. 즉 우리 ITDumpsKR 덤프들은 아주 믿음이 가는 보장되는 덤프들이란 말이죠. ITDumpsKR에는 베터랑의전문가들로 이루어진 연구팀이 잇습니다, 그들은 it지식과 풍부한 경험으로 여러 가지 여러분이Adobe인증AD0-E902시험을 패스할 수 있을 자료 등을 만들었습니다 여러분이Adobe인증AD0-E902시험에 많은 도움이AD0-E902될 것입니다. ITDumpsKR 가 제공하는AD0-E902테스트버전과 문제집은 모두AD0-E902인증시험에 대하여 충분한 연구 끝에 만든 것이기에 무조건 한번에AD0-E902시험을 패스하실 수 있습니다.

Adobe AD0-E902 시험요강:

주제
소개

주제 1

Scenario Design and Architecture: This section of the exam measures the skills of Solution Architects and focuses on designing and structuring Fusion scenarios efficiently. Candidates must determine the correct steps to parse JSON, perform data lookups, and distinguish between different triggers. Understanding system limitations, module selection, and timezone handling is also essential. One key skill assessed is identifying the appropriate method for uploading documents while managing access controls.

주제 2

Testing and Error Handling: This section of the exam measures the skills of Quality Assurance Engineers and evaluates the principles of testing and error handling in Fusion. Candidates must define test plans and test cases, identify directives for handling unreliable services, and configure custom error handling mechanisms. One specific skill tested is applying the correct error-handling directive to manage service disruptions.

주제 3

Working with APIs: This section of the exam measures the skills of Integration Specialists and assesses knowledge of API interactions within Fusion. Candidates must handle rate-limiting errors, identify ways to integrate third-party APIs and determine the correct module types when built-in functionalities are unavailable. One critical skill evaluated is implementing a solution for API rate limits to ensure seamless integration.

주제 4

Foundational Technical Concepts: This section of the exam measures the skills of Fusion Developers and covers core technical concepts related to data transformation, function nesting, and expression formation in Fusion. Candidates must understand how to modify field formats, use appropriate functions, and work with data manipulation techniques. One key skill evaluated is selecting the correct function to transform data between different formats.

>> AD0-E902인증덤프공부 <<

AD0-E902인증덤프공부 최신 인기시험 공부문제

ITDumpsKR에서는 Adobe인증 AD0-E902시험을 도전해보시려는 분들을 위해 퍼펙트한 Adobe인증 AD0-E902덤프를 가벼운 가격으로 제공해드립니다.덤프는Adobe인증 AD0-E902시험의 기출문제와 예상문제로 제작된것으로서 시험문제를 거의 100%커버하고 있습니다. ITDumpsKR제품을 한번 믿어주시면 기적을 가져다 드릴것입니다.

최신 Adobe Workfront AD0-E902 무료샘플문제 (Q38-Q43):

질문 # 38
In a scenario that searches for recently completed tasks, a user notices the following input and output for a date transformation.
Input: March 3, 2021 10:34 AM Output: March 1, 2021 10:34 AM
Which expression produces this date transformation?

A. addHours(now; -48)
B. subDays(now,2)
C. addDays(today; -4)

정답：B

설명：
* Understanding the Date Transformation:
* Input:March 3, 2021, 10:34 AM
* Output:March 1, 2021, 10:34 AM
* The transformation subtracts2 daysfrom the input date without altering the time.
* Why Option A is Correct:
* subDays(now,2) subtracts exactly 2 days from the given date and time.
* It preserves the time component of the input (10:34 AM) while shifting the date backward by 2 days, which matches the given output.
* Why the Other Options are Incorrect:
* Option B ("addHours(now; -48)"): While subtracting 48 hours also results in a 2-day difference, this approach directly modifies the time. The resulting time could shift if the operation crosses daylight saving changes or edge cases with leap seconds. It is less reliable compared to subDays.
* Option C ("addDays(today; -4)"): This would subtract 4 days, which does not match the transformation shown in the example.
References and Supporting Documentation:
* Adobe Workfront Fusion: Date and Time Functions
* Workfront Community: Using Date and Time Expressions

질문 # 39
A user needs to find a fields options within a custom form field. The details for the request are shown in the image below:

Which option is applicable for the URL text box?

A. A screenshot of a computer Description automatically generated
B. A screenshot of a web page Description automatically generated
C. A screenshot of a web browser Description automatically generated

정답：C

설명：
Step-by-Step Explanation
* Purpose of the Query:
* The task is to retrievefield optionsfrom acustom form field. This operation involves fetching data, not creating or modifying it, which requires a GET method.
* Correct API Structure:
* The URL must follow Workfront's API structure:
ruby
Copy
https://{your-workfront-domain}/attask/api/{version}/{endpoint}
* OptionBfollows this standard structure, where:
* wfdomain.workfront.com is the placeholder for the Workfront instance.
* /attask/api/v12.0 specifies the API version.
* /PARAM/search is the endpoint to search for parameters or fields.
* Why Not Other Options?
* A: The use of POST is incorrect because it is meant for creating or updating resources, not retrieving data. Additionally, the URL structure is incorrect and includes unnecessary query strings (username, password) not relevant for this operation.
* C: While the method GET is correct, the URL (PARAM/search) is incomplete and lacks the required Workfront API structure, making it invalid.
References
* Workfront API Documentation: Querying and Retrieving Custom Form Field Data
* Experience League Community: Best Practices for Using GET Methods in Workfront API=========================

질문 # 40
A Fusion Developer receives frequent notifications that a specific Scenario has been stopped. Upon investigation, the developer notes that there is nothing wrong with the data or process in the scenario, but that the error always occurs on a specific module that calls a third-party system. The error recorded is consistently a service unavailable error, particularly during times of high network traffic to the target system.
Which action should the Fusion Developer take to reduce the number of times the scenario is automatically stopped by Fusion?

A. Add an additional route after the failing module with a repeater to retry errors.
B. Update the Module settings to automatically ignore failed executions.
C. Add an error handler to the Module and select a Break directive.
D. Update the Scenario settings to automatically retry failed executions.

정답：D

설명：
In this scenario, the error consistently arises due to the unavailability of a third-party service during high traffic times. This is a temporary issue and does not indicate a problem with the data or process. The recommended approach in such cases is to configure the scenario to retry failed executions:
* Update Scenario Settings:
* In Workfront Fusion, you can configure scenarios to automatically retry a failed execution.
* This option ensures that temporary issues, like service unavailability, are retried after a delay, reducing the chances of the scenario being stopped permanently.
* This is particularly useful when dealing with network traffic spikes or third-party API throttling.
* Why Not Other Options?
* B. Update the Module settings to automatically ignore failed executions: Ignoring failed executions would cause incomplete or incorrect data to flow through the scenario, leading to potential downstream issues.
* C. Add an error handler to the Module and select a Break directive: While error handlers are useful, the Break directive stops the scenario from processing further, which is not ideal for a temporary issue.
* D. Add an additional route after the failing module with a repeater: Adding a repeater increases complexity and is unnecessary when the retry option is already available in scenario settings.
References:
* Adobe Workfront Fusion Documentation: Scenario Settings and Error Handling
* Experience League Community: Handling API Rate Limits and Errors in Workfront Fusion

질문 # 41
A global customer has end users who input date and currency data into fields in inconsistent formats. Despite continued training efforts, this continues to be an issue. Unfortunately, the third-party service that the end users are using does not support forcing a required field format. These input mistakes do not happen frequently, but they currently stop the scenario from executing after the default three retries.
In Fusion, which action can the admin take to ensure that errors are corrected after they occur in a scenario?

A. Use the switch module to catch dates not in the required format and convert the common misused patterns into the appropriate format to prevent the scenario from stopping after three failed executions.
B. Select storing of Incomplete Executions in the scenario settings. The customer admin can then filter and search the execution history to resolve errors as they occur.
C. Set up an error handling path that will catch errors in the end user's inputs and message the users in an email update that they need to try again.

정답：B

설명：
* Understanding the Scenario:
* The issue involves end users inputting inconsistent date and currency formats that result in errors in a Workfront Fusion scenario.
* The default behavior of Fusion stops the scenario after three retries due to input mismatches or invalid formats.
* Why Option A is Correct:
* Storing Incomplete Executions: In Adobe Workfront Fusion, enabling "Store incomplete executions" in the scenario settings allows administrators to capture incomplete runs without fully stopping the entire process. This feature stores all relevant data, even from incomplete runs, allowing administrators to identify and correct input issues manually.
* Error Troubleshooting: By reviewing incomplete executions, admins can pinpoint where the scenario failed, resolve the issue, and potentially reprocess those incomplete records, preventing complete scenario stoppage.
* Why Option B is Incorrect:
* The "switch module" can handle specific input variations, but it is not a comprehensive solution for handling unexpected or inconsistent formats entered by end users. While it might mitigate some errors, it does not address the root cause and can miss unanticipated input patterns.
* Why Option C is Incorrect:
* Setting up an error handling path to notify users and request corrections adds an additional manual step for users but does not resolve the problem efficiently within Fusion. Moreover, this solution does not prevent the scenario from halting after retries.
* Steps to Enable Storing Incomplete Executions:
* Navigate to the scenario in Adobe Workfront Fusion.
* Open theScenario Settingsby clicking the gear icon.
* Enable the optionStore Incomplete Executionsunder Execution settings.
* Save the settings and activate the scenario.
* How This Solves the Problem:
* Enabling this setting ensures that no data is lost when the scenario fails due to inconsistent inputs.
Admins can access the incomplete executions through the scenario execution history, apply necessary corrections, and retry specific records or steps as needed.
References and Supporting Documentation:
* Adobe Workfront Fusion Official Documentation: Scenario Settings
* Workfront Community: Handling Incomplete Executions

질문 # 42
A Fusion scenario is triggered by a project status update. The scenario then updates the status, causing repeated execution of the scenario.
Which action should a user take to keep this from happening?

A. Schedule the instant trigger to only run at intervals to prevent Fusion from thinking the record has been updated after each run
B. When using instant triggers, finish the scenario with the Break directive to prevent the record from being updated again
C. Create a filter after the instant trigger that only passes records that have not been updated by Fusion

정답：C

설명：
Step by Step Comprehensive Detailed Explanation:
* Understanding the Problem:
* The scenario is triggered by a project status update.
* After the scenario runs, it updates the project status again, which re-triggers the scenario, creating aloop.
* The goal is to prevent the scenario from re-triggering itself.
* Option Analysis:
* A. When using instant triggers, finish the scenario with the Break directive to prevent the record from being updated again:
* Incorrect. The Break directive is not used to prevent updates; it is used to stop further iterations of a scenario. It does not address the root cause of the loop, which is the re- triggering by updated records.
* B. Create a filter after the instant trigger that only passes records that have not been updated by Fusion:
* Correct. Adding a filter ensures that only records not recently updated by Fusion are processed. This prevents Fusion from re-triggering itself on the same record.
* For example, you could use a condition to check if the Last Updated By field does not equal the Fusion user or if the Last Update Date is older than a certain threshold.
* C. Schedule the instant trigger to only run at intervals to prevent Fusion from thinking the record has been updated after each run:
* Incorrect. Instant triggers are event-driven, and their purpose is to respond to changes immediately. Scheduling them would negate the benefit of instant triggers and does not solve the root problem.
* Why Filtering Records is Best:
* Targeted Control: A filter after the trigger ensures only relevant updates (e.g., those not caused by Fusion) are processed.
* Prevents Loops: By excluding records updated by Fusion, the scenario avoids re-triggering itself.
* Maintains Performance: Filtering prevents unnecessary processing of irrelevant records, improving efficiency.
* How to Implement:
* After the instant trigger module, add a filter module.
* Configure the filter to check the Last Updated By field or a custom flag indicating if the update was performed by Fusion.
* Example: Last Updated By # Fusion User or Update Flag # True.
* If a custom flag is used, ensure the flag is set when Fusion updates the record.
* Alternative Solutions:
* Add a custom field (e.g., "Updated by Fusion") that Fusion sets when it updates a record. This can also be used in the filter condition.
References:This approach aligns with Fusion best practices for preventing infinite loops caused by scenarios re-triggering themselves. Filtering ensures the scenario runs only when necessary, avoiding redundant processing and maintaining performance.

질문 # 43
......

Adobe인증 AD0-E902시험을 패스하고 싶다면ITDumpsKR에서 출시한Adobe인증 AD0-E902덤프가 필수이겠죠. Adobe인증 AD0-E902시험을 통과하여 원하는 자격증을 취득하시면 회사에서 자기만의 위치를 단단하게 하여 인정을 받을수 있습니다.이 점이 바로 많은 IT인사들이Adobe인증 AD0-E902시험에 도전하는 원인이 아닐가 싶습니다. ITDumpsKR에서 출시한Adobe인증 AD0-E902덤프 실제시험의 거의 모든 문제를 커버하고 있어 최고의 인기와 사랑을 받고 있습니다. 어느사이트의Adobe인증 AD0-E902공부자료도ITDumpsKR제품을 대체할수 없습니다.학원등록 필요없이 다른 공부자료 필요없이 덤프에 있는 문제만 완벽하게 공부하신다면Adobe인증 AD0-E902시험패스가 어렵지 않고 자격증취득이 쉬워집니다.

AD0-E902최신버전 시험대비 공부문제: https://www.itdumpskr.com/AD0-E902-exam.html